<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Ingo” 2005 Young Adult novel by Helen Dunmore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chock.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/%e2%80%9cingo%e2%80%9d-2005-young-adult-novel-by-helen-dunmore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chock.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/%e2%80%9cingo%e2%80%9d-2005-young-adult-novel-by-helen-dunmore/</link>
	<description>The screenplay is stronger than the swordplay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://chock.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/%e2%80%9cingo%e2%80%9d-2005-young-adult-novel-by-helen-dunmore/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chock.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/%e2%80%9cingo%e2%80%9d-2005-young-adult-novel-by-helen-dunmore/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Well, the end is a slight let-down, but I still highly recommend the book and will be reading the two sequels.

the only criticism I can think of (and it&#039;s a slight one):

If it&#039;s your nature as a writer to be poetic (dunmore is a poet) as well as observant (poets are generally observant), the risk of writing from the viewpoint of a child (as dunmore does in &quot;Ingo&quot;) is that it subverts verisimilitude.

what I mean is that dunmore (who is also able to get into the mind of a child) creates narration in one paragraph that sounds like the authentic voice of a young girl. but in the next paragraph the child might come up with an observation like &quot;the world of smells for a dog is like being in library with a million book.&quot; 

only a genius child would be able to come up with observations like that time after time. and I would bet that not even shakespeare (at the same age) could have done it w the regularity that the narrator in &quot;Ingo&quot; does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the end is a slight let-down, but I still highly recommend the book and will be reading the two sequels.</p>
<p>the only criticism I can think of (and it&#8217;s a slight one):</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s your nature as a writer to be poetic (dunmore is a poet) as well as observant (poets are generally observant), the risk of writing from the viewpoint of a child (as dunmore does in &#8220;Ingo&#8221;) is that it subverts verisimilitude.</p>
<p>what I mean is that dunmore (who is also able to get into the mind of a child) creates narration in one paragraph that sounds like the authentic voice of a young girl. but in the next paragraph the child might come up with an observation like &#8220;the world of smells for a dog is like being in library with a million book.&#8221; </p>
<p>only a genius child would be able to come up with observations like that time after time. and I would bet that not even shakespeare (at the same age) could have done it w the regularity that the narrator in &#8220;Ingo&#8221; does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
